Ex-leader Trump indicated this past weekend that the Moscow-drafted proposal for peace constituted not his ultimate proposal, after intense reaction from Ukrainian leaders and analysts who likened it to a Munich pact of 1938 between Neville Chamberlain and Hitler.
In short remarks at the White House, the US president informed reporters: Our goal is to achieve peace. It should’ve happened a long time ago … we are attempting to conclude it, one way or the other we have to get it ended."
Ukrainian and American officials will meet in Switzerland this Sunday for discussions on this proposal. Security officials from France, Britain and Germany will also participate in the talks in Geneva.
Ahead of these discussions, American lawmakers told media outlets that Secretary of State Marco Rubio contacted them during his travel to Switzerland to clarify the details of the leaked plan. According to him, the proposal "was not the administration’s plan" but instead a "wish list of the Russians", according to Senator King, who serves on the Foreign Relations Committee.
However, the former president has set Volodymyr Zelenskyy a deadline of Thursday to sign the 28-point document. It calls on Ukraine to cede territory it currently controls to Russia, downsize the size of its army, and relinquish advanced weaponry. It also excludes international peacekeepers and sanctions for Russian war crimes.
In a sombre speech last Friday, the Ukrainian leader warned that his country confronts an impossible choice over the coming days involving keeping the nation's honor and losing key ally in the shape of the US. Zelenskyy acknowledged that Ukraine is experiencing an extremely challenging period historically.
Speaking this weekend, the president said that genuine or "dignified" peace depends on assured safety and fairness. He revealed a delegation, appointed by presidential decree, which will meet its US counterparts in Switzerland, led by top aide Andriy Yermak.
A additional delegate from Ukraine's team, ex-defense head and national security council secretary Umerov, stated there would be discussions with the US regarding potential terms for a peace deal.
Suggesting red lines, Umerov noted: "Ukraine approaches this process with a clear understanding of its interests. This represents a continuation of recent discussions focused on harmonizing our plans for future actions."
The Ukrainian president has sought to participate positively with the US administration seemingly determined to end the conflict based on Russian conditions. He has emphasized that he will not surrender Ukraine’s sovereignty or abandon the constitutional framework that enshrines Ukraine's territorial integrity.
During a summit held in South Africa, G20 leaders and EU representatives issued a joint statement opposing Trump’s plan, saying it needs further refinement. The statement indicated that members of the EU and NATO must be involved on some of its provisions, that exclude Kyiv’s Nato membership and put conditions on its future EU accession.
Responses from Ukrainians to the text, prepared by a Russian representative and a US delegate, have been largely negative. Commentators argued it outlined a plan for further Russian aggression: targeting not just Ukraine but other European regions too.
Mustafa Nayyem, a public figure involved in the 2014 Maidan protests, said it drew comparisons with Chamberlain’s infamous Munich deal. The proposal belonged to the same "recognisable genre", where the affected party is asked "to formulate his own defeat so everyone else can live easier".
On social media, Nayyem said he was outraged by the complete pardon for Russian atrocities. It was an insult people who had hidden in basements in affected cities – where Russian troops executed hundreds of civilians – and for those whose children had been forcibly deported to Russian territory. "A rather cynical agreement," he stated.
Speaking in Kyiv’s Golden Gate metro station, Sariskyi, 21, said that Moscow has attempted to dominate Ukraine "for years". The agreement offered "barely anything" in the proposed deal and maintained troops in Ukraine. "I think the deal is an attempt to break Ukraine and force unjust conditions on us," he remarked.
Should Ukraine accept the terms it would be compelled to give up its freedoms, he added. If rejected, the US would most likely break off cooperation and intelligence sharing, a vital resource of battlefield information for frontline Ukrainian troops. Currently, there is no favorable solution, he remarked.
A different commuter, 19-year-old Sofia Barchan, asserted that the country would "keep strong" lacking US backing. We will continue our struggle as needed. Our territory will remain our territory, including Crimea and the east. It belongs to Ukraine." She expressed that the president is intelligent and predicted he would not give up Ukrainian land.
While speaking during rainfall, next to a replica of Kyiv’s original medieval gate, Olena Ivanovna said she was grateful to Trump for his attempts to broker peace. She suggested that the nation should be ready to give away certain regions for a limited time if it meant maintaining US support. The president should conduct a public vote on this matter, she said.
Previous European leaders have roundly condemned the plan. Ex-PM of Finland Sanna Marin called it a catastrophe, not only for Ukraine and Ukrainians but for democracies worldwide. She warned if Western nations display vulnerability – as it did in 2014 when Putin annexed Crimea – further hostilities would follow.
The former prime minister of Belgium, Guy Verhofstadt, referenced Churchill’s definition regarding appeasement as someone who accommodates an aggressor. He continued: Trump aligns with Putin. Europe faces a choice between compromise and principles. Another moment of truth for our [European] union."
Renewable energy consultant with over a decade of experience in sustainable development projects across Europe.